Selasa, 19 Juni 2018

Hussy.io = Is the oldest platform of the longest secure profession with Blockchain

Related image
Red Light Legal , which offers legal representation to anyone in the sex trade, hosts online who know your rights workshop to create an arrest plan. The anti-sex work law often impedes support groups working to provide security resources (such as safer sex supplies, housing and information on harm reduction) to vulnerable sex workers by likening aid to pimps, pandering or promoting trade ; When sex work is not a crime, these groups can provide assistance to sex workers fearlessly.
Criminalizing and aggressively cracking down on all sex work encourages consensual sex workers underground and into unsafe environments, possibly creating trafficking victims and making sex workers less secure. 
In practice, however, the real targets of the war on trade are low-income consensual sex workers whose livelihoods and ability to remain secure have long been dependent on resources removed from the internet in the name of ending human trafficking.

It seems worth asking why members of Congress can cross the aisle when it means passing laws that suppress freedom of speech and reduce the safety of women and men who are just trying to earn a living - while fact-based solutions are proven to make sex work safer and effective in combating trafficking denied by conservative liberal and Christian feminists. Groups including Amnesty International, the USA Freedom Network, the Global Alliance on Traffic for Women, Human Rights Watch, UNAIDS, the World Health Organization, the International Women's Health Coalition and many advocates of sex workers and support groups have provided their support behind the decriminalization of consensual sex work,

They have clarified that sex workers choose to trade friendships, entertainment, amulet games, and other services for fellow adults, while those who are victims of trafficking are forced to provide these services against their will. Top-crust subscribers can read carefully the sex workers on websites that provide screening services for "high-end" adult companions. On average, Joe, on the other hand, can find more economical options under the "escort" section of other sites. Understanding this reality is the key to fighting the specter of human trafficking in our country. Sex trafficking across America is a more secretive activity, hidden in the rapidly expanding commercial sex industry in our country for decades, and in front of the eye under legitimate business layers.
This development took place almost one month after the House of Representatives authorized States and Victims to Fight the Online Sex Trade Act or FOSTA on the 388-25 vote, posting or hosting online prostitution ads as a federal crime. As advertised by their sponsor, they are an aggressive law that will help bring down traffickers who have forced vulnerable and underage women into sex workers against their will - a mission that most of us can follow. A related bill seeking to cut banking services for "human traffickers" has found equally broad support, passing 408-2 in the House, with parts in the Senate looking very likely. The possibility that this law will be challenged in court and ultimately canceled: Proponents argue that especially the original bill,  which targets various sex-related speeches defined as "trafficking in persons," is more likely to curb the freedom of speech by encouraging online platforms to censor their users than to combat trafficking. For those who work sex is the only plausible option, it means switching to street-based sex work or using the services of a pest or torturous agent, landing in the same situation as a war against trade claimed to protect them. In a statement sent to the Senate Commerce committee last November, they argued: "Online providers should not and should not be subject to criminal liability simply to facilitate the speech of others - even if the elements of communication are unpleasant or even unlawful." more likely to curb freedom of speech by encouraging online platforms to censor their users than to combat trafficking. For those who work sex is the only plausible option, it means switching to street-based sex work or using the services of a pest or torturous agent, landing in the same situation as a war against trade claimed to protect them. In a statement sent to the Senate Commerce committee last November, they argued: "Online providers should not and should not be subject to criminal liability simply to facilitate the speech of others - even if the elements of communication are unpleasant or even unlawful." more likely to curb freedom of speech by encouraging online platforms to censor their users than to combat trafficking. For those who work sex is the only plausible option, it means switching to street-based sex work or using the services of a pest or torturous agent, landing in the same situation as a war against trade claimed to protect them. In a statement sent to the Senate Commerce committee last November, they argued: "Online providers should not and should not be subject to criminal liability simply to facilitate the speech of others - even if the elements of communication are unpleasant or even unlawful." it means turning to street-based sex work or using the services of a pimp or a potentially violent agency, landing in a situation similar to a war against trade claimed to protect them from. In a statement sent to the Senate Commerce committee last November, they argued: "Online providers should not and should not be subject to criminal liability simply to facilitate the speech of others - even if the elements of communication are unpleasant or even unlawful." it means turning to street-based sex work or using the services of a pimp or a potentially violent agency, landing in a situation similar to a war against trade claimed to protect them from. In a statement sent to the Senate Commerce committee last November, they argued: "Online providers should not and should not be subject to criminal liability simply to facilitate the speech of others - even if the elements of communication are unpleasant or even unlawful."

The organization added that such responsibility would actually make it more difficult to expose criminal activity. The author and his supporters framed Section 230 as a gap allowing websites to benefit from forums that "help, facilitate, or support the sex trade." Without a free Internet forum, sex workers of all kinds will lose access to resources that can help them survive and thrive. 

According to one "John," a former journalist and media relations specialist today, 

"I do not pay for sex, I pay for a different experience and go afterwards."

"John" is one of the many men who call themselves "fans" or "mongers" in online erotic review forums. The main difference between approving prostitution and the sex trade is the use of force, deception or coercion for the purpose of exploitation. Alex Empire, who is a moderator of a subreddit called Sexworkers, received a message from a reddit administrator of Zippylooda who warned him that "any post that can facilitate the relationship of sex and sex buyers will be a violation" of the update to the reddit content policy.
Meet our team
Our team members have different backgrounds, but we all have the same passion to create products that change people's lives.
Advisory Board

For more details, you can visit us below:
Website:  https://hussy.io/

Author by: Kobro
My ETH Address: 0x8f5ef4838E6E3Df2095B3beb6C149AdE718D5D07



Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar